Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [RFC] --exclude-ports option for Nmap
From: Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:27:50 -0500
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Jay Bosamiya <jaybosamiya () gmail com> wrote:
I would have a limited time span for which I can run the hourly scan and my top-ports number is limited by this.
This sentence was enough to change my opinion on the topic. --top-ports is semantically an "optimize my time" option, which is why the "fast scan" option (-F) is an alias for --top-ports 100. If --exclude-ports reduces the total number of ports scanned, then it changes the tradeoff calculus, which we should probably avoid. I think you have enough to start coding now. Dan _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- [RFC] --exclude-ports option for Nmap Jay Bosamiya (Jun 03)
- Re: [RFC] --exclude-ports option for Nmap Jacek Wielemborek (Jun 05)
- Re: [RFC] --exclude-ports option for Nmap John (Jun 06)
- Re: [RFC] --exclude-ports option for Nmap Jay Bosamiya (Jun 06)
- Re: [RFC] --exclude-ports option for Nmap John (Jun 06)
- Re: [RFC] --exclude-ports option for Nmap Daniel Miller (Jun 10)
- Re: [RFC] --exclude-ports option for Nmap Fyodor (Jun 10)
- Re: [RFC] --exclude-ports option for Nmap Jay Bosamiya (Jun 11)
- Re: [RFC] --exclude-ports option for Nmap Daniel Miller (Jun 11)
- Re: [RFC] --exclude-ports option for Nmap Jay Bosamiya (Jun 11)
- Re: [RFC] --exclude-ports option for Nmap Jacek Wielemborek (Jun 05)