Nmap Development mailing list archives
Should nmap fall back to -sT if we can't perform a raw scan?
From: Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:18:43 +0200
List, On my system, nmap's executable has selinux privileges allowing it to perform raw scans, which I turn on by default by exporting NMAP_PRIVILEGED="1". Today I noticed that this setup breaks scanning localhost: [13:16:20][~/workspace/nmap-svn]$ ./nmap --privileged localhost Starting Nmap 6.46 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-04-29 13:16 CEST socket troubles in Init: Operation not permitted (1) Perhaps we need to fall back to -sT in some cases, such as this one? Yours, Jacek Wielemborek
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Should nmap fall back to -sT if we can't perform a raw scan? Jacek Wielemborek (Apr 29)
- Re: Should nmap fall back to -sT if we can't perform a raw scan? Fyodor (May 01)