Re: GSoC 2014

[Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com>]

25/02/2014 14:27:25 Henri Doreau <henri.doreau () gmail com>:
> 2014-02-25 14:14 GMT+01:00 Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com>:
> > 25.02.2014 13:59, Jacek Wielemborek:
> > > I just re-read this document and I'm getting the impression that 21
> > > ideas is too much to keep in a single group.
> >
> > Another idea - split it by projects (Ncat, Nmap, Zenmap). Actually, both
> > could be done, in separate pages. My point is just that the current form
> > might be too long for some people to skim.
> >
> > Also, I added another idea regarding scanning inside Tor.
>
> HI Jacek,
>
> I like the idea of grouping but I'm not sure how to do it best. Having
> per-project sections can be good (FreeBSD page is excellent[1]). If
> you do it please keep nsock scan/NSE scan and proxy scan close to each
> other, they're very similar.
>
> Another subdivision can be something like performance, discovery...
>
> Feel free to update the page!
>
>
> [1] https://wiki.freebsd.org/IdeasPage

(I forgot to CC the mailing list)

I added two new ideas. Also, I moved "nsock based port scanning" to a separate 
page to demonstrate my idea of categorizing GSoC ideas - we could create 
categories like "bug wrangler tasks", "full-summer tasks" and "specialist 
tasks" in addition to categorizing the tasks by projects. 

Please take a look at the "GSoC community ideas" page again [1] and let me 
know what do you guys think about it. If nobody's against such approach, I 
might re-organize the list within a few days (maybe even tomorrow, unless 
somebody does that before me).

[1] https://secwiki.org/w/GSoC_community_ideas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/