Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [nmap-svn] r32114 - nmap-exp/d33tah/ncat-lua-callbacks/ncat/test
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:37:16 -0700
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Jacek Wielemborek wrote:
The new addition to the tests uncovered a weird, probably unwanted behavior introduced in r32028. The problem is that when you do -L scripts/filters/rot13.lua on both proxy server and proxy client, the target through which we're proxying to also needs to be run with -L rot13.lua. Should I revert r32028 to make the ultimate destination host receive the decoded data?
Does --load-lua-socket-file affect proxy negotiation? My impression is that it shouldn't, neither in connect nor listen mode. The proxy stuff should always be unmodified by Lua. Only the traffic that goes through the proxy (after negotiation) should be changed. In other words, you should have to specify base64 on the client and the server, but not on the proxy in between. The -L modification should be strictly between the client and the server. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: [nmap-svn] r32114 - nmap-exp/d33tah/ncat-lua-callbacks/ncat/test Jacek Wielemborek (Aug 30)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r32114 - nmap-exp/d33tah/ncat-lua-callbacks/ncat/test David Fifield (Aug 30)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r32114 - nmap-exp/d33tah/ncat-lua-callbacks/ncat/test Jacek Wielemborek (Aug 30)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r32114 - nmap-exp/d33tah/ncat-lua-callbacks/ncat/test David Fifield (Aug 30)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r32114 - nmap-exp/d33tah/ncat-lua-callbacks/ncat/test Jacek Wielemborek (Aug 30)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r32114 - nmap-exp/d33tah/ncat-lua-callbacks/ncat/test David Fifield (Aug 30)