Re: Wild TTL value

[Gisle Vanem <gvanem () broadpark no>]

"David Fifield" <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:

> Please try this patch. What I need you to check is that it has the same
> behavior as before on platforms like Linux that don't give an error for
> -1. That is, perhaps existing behavior on Linux is to set the TTL to 255
> when IP_TTL is set like this, and if that's true, perhaps we should try
> to keep the behavior.

Your patch looks okay. No error from Winsock now.

--gv
_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/