Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: Why 232 rounds?


From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 02:30:39 -0700

On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Luis MartinGarcia.
<luis.mgarc () gmail com> wrote:

I am happy to report that as of r30027, the issue Fyodor reported, is
fixed. Could you please svn update and try again?

Thanks Luis.  The "Error opening capture device" error is gone.
However, when I try to run it as nonroot against scanme.nmap.org port
80, I get this repeatable failure starting on the third probe:

[fyodor@hax nmap-npingchanges]$ nping/nping scanme.nmap.org

Starting Nping 0.6.02 ( http://nmap.org/nping ) at 2012-10-13 01:58 PDT
SENT (0.0000s) Starting TCP Handshake > 74.207.244.221:80
RECV (0.0200s) Handshake with 74.207.244.221:80 completed
SENT (1.0010s) Starting TCP Handshake > 74.207.244.221:80
RECV (1.0230s) Handshake with 74.207.244.221:80 completed
SENT (2.0010s) Starting TCP Handshake > 74.207.244.221:80
RECV (2.0010s) Possible TCP RST received from 74.207.244.221:80 -->
Cannot assign requested address
SENT (3.0000s) Starting TCP Handshake > 74.207.244.221:80
RECV (3.0000s) Possible TCP RST received from 74.207.244.221:80 -->
Cannot assign requested address
SENT (3.9990s) Starting TCP Handshake > 74.207.244.221:80
RECV (3.9990s) Possible TCP RST received from 74.207.244.221:80 -->
Cannot assign requested address

TCP connection attempts: 5 | Successful connections: 2 | Failed: 3 (40.00%)
Max rtt: N/A | Min rtt: N/A | Avg rtt: N/A
Tx time: 3.99832s | Tx bytes/s: 0.00 | Tx pkts/s: 0.00
Rx time: 4.99908s | Rx bytes/s: 0.00 | Rx pkts/s: 0.00
Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 5.14 seconds


I'm not sure if this is due to trying to bind the same source address
or what.  But it doesn't happen for me with the trunk nping:

[fyodor@hax nmap]$ nping/nping scanme.nmap.org

Starting Nping 0.6.02 ( http://nmap.org/nping ) at 2012-10-13 01:59 PDT
SENT (0.0178s) Starting TCP Handshake > scanme.nmap.org:80 (74.207.244.221:80)
RECV (0.0395s) Handshake with scanme.nmap.org:80 (74.207.244.221:80) completed
SENT (1.0198s) Starting TCP Handshake > scanme.nmap.org:80 (74.207.244.221:80)
RECV (1.0414s) Handshake with scanme.nmap.org:80 (74.207.244.221:80) completed
SENT (2.0218s) Starting TCP Handshake > scanme.nmap.org:80 (74.207.244.221:80)
RECV (2.0436s) Handshake with scanme.nmap.org:80 (74.207.244.221:80) completed
SENT (3.0248s) Starting TCP Handshake > scanme.nmap.org:80 (74.207.244.221:80)
RECV (3.0472s) Handshake with scanme.nmap.org:80 (74.207.244.221:80) completed
SENT (4.0268s) Starting TCP Handshake > scanme.nmap.org:80 (74.207.244.221:80)
RECV (4.0462s) Handshake with scanme.nmap.org:80 (74.207.244.221:80) completed

Max rtt: 22.394ms | Min rtt: 19.456ms | Avg rtt: 21.426ms
TCP connection attempts: 5 | Successful connections: 5 | Failed: 0 (0.00%)
Tx time: 4.01011s | Tx bytes/s: 99.75 | Tx pkts/s: 1.25
Rx time: 4.02957s | Rx bytes/s: 49.63 | Rx pkts/s: 1.24
Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 4.05 seconds


Cheers,
Fyodor
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/


Current thread: