Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: NMAP crash -- more
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:21:11 -0700
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 01:29:07PM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
I think this is unrelated to the problem of exceeding the socket limit. OS detection seems to ignore -S the same way it ignores -g and other options. See http://nmap.org/book/man-bypass-firewalls-ids.html. Ignoring -S is probably a bug. But I think you will see the same during OS detection against any host, not just this one that is exceeding the socket limit.
For what it is worth, -S seems to work with -O in my quick testing. For example, I did this on my Linux box with latest svn: ./nmap -S 127.0.0.2 -p8080,2000 -O localhost -e lo --packet-trace And all of the sent packets came from 127.0.0.2. Or maybe one of your recent changes fixed this. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- NMAP crash -- more starlight . 2012q3 (Sep 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NMAP crash -- more starlight . 2012q3 (Sep 13)
- NMAP crash -- more starlight . 2012q3 (Sep 13)
- Re: NMAP crash -- more David Fifield (Sep 13)
- Re: NMAP crash -- more starlight . 2012q3 (Sep 13)
- Re: NMAP crash -- more David Fifield (Sep 13)
- Re: NMAP crash -- more starlight . 2012q3 (Sep 13)
- Re: NMAP crash -- more David Fifield (Sep 13)
- Re: NMAP crash -- more Fyodor (Sep 17)
- Re: NMAP crash -- more David Fifield (Sep 18)
- Re: NMAP crash -- more David Fifield (Sep 26)
- Re: NMAP crash -- more starlight . 2012q3 (Sep 26)
- Re: NMAP crash -- more David Fifield (Sep 26)