Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug
From: 'David Fifield' <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:14:29 -0700
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:29:18PM -0500, security-lists wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: David Fifield [mailto:david () bamsoftware com] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 06:10 To: security-lists Cc: nmap-dev () insecure org Subject: Re: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 10:46:16PM -0500, security-lists wrote:I still find v6,01 has the "this requested address is not valid," bug.Cansomeone verify? Platform: Windows XP Home SP3 C:\Documents and Settings\Me>nmap -sS -O 10.250.1.0/24 Starting Nmap 6.01 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-07-07 22:20 CentralDaylightTime get_srcaddr: can't connect socket: The requested address is not valid initscon text. Failed to convert source address to presentation format!?! Error: Unknown errorThe message "The requested address is not valid in its context" is still printed though it is no longer a fatal error since r28874. When this happens, it uses the address of the interface as the source address instead. What is your "nmap --iflist"? Probably one of the interface addresses is the one causing the error about the presentation format.C:\Documents and Settings\Me>nmap --iflist Starting Nmap 6.01 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-07-10 12:11 Central Daylight Time ************************INTERFACES************************ DEV (SHORT) IP/MASK TYPE UP MTU MAC eth0 (eth0) 10.250.1.97/24 ethernet up 1500 00:0A:E4:D1:43:BF lo0 (lo0) 127.0.0.1/0 loopback up 1520 DEV WINDEVICE eth0 \Device\NPF_{DB60E43C-545D-46C8-B15B-5F28B14B1B1C} lo0 <none> <none> \Device\NPF_GenericDialupAdapter **************************ROUTES************************** DST/MASK DEV GATEWAY 255.255.255.255/32 eth0 10.250.1.97 10.255.255.255/32 eth0 10.250.1.97 10.250.1.97/32 lo0 127.0.0.1 10.250.1.0/24 eth0 10.250.1.97 127.0.0.0/8 lo0 127.0.0.1 224.0.0.0/4 eth0 10.250.1.97 0.0.0.0/0 eth0 10.250.1.3
Can you also please give us the output of nmap --route-dst 10.250.1.0 --route-dst 10.250.1.3 nmap --route-dst 10.250.1.10 --route-dst 10.250.1.97 The only strange thing I see in the --iflist output is the netmask of /0, which I don't suppose is responsible for the error you're seeing. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug security-lists (Jul 07)
- Re: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug Ron (Jul 07)
- RE: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug security-lists (Jul 08)
- Re: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug David Fifield (Jul 09)
- RE: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug security-lists (Jul 10)
- Re: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug 'David Fifield' (Sep 12)
- RE: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug security-lists (Jul 10)
- Re: nmap 6.01 requested address is not valid bug Ron (Jul 07)