Nmap Development mailing list archives
[bug] nexthost: failed to find route to XXX (directly connected, with --randomize-hosts)
From: Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:05:52 -0500
List,Ran into what I think is a bug related to hostgroups and the --randomize-hosts argument. Before I start speculating wildly, here's what's going on:
My subnet is XXX.XXX.64.0/21, my IP is XXX.XXX.69.208, and I want to scan XXX.XXX.0.0/16. I am also using the --exclude-file option to exclude about 6 /24 subnets, and using the --randomize-hosts argument. Host discovery goes well, but during the port scan, I get "nexthost: failed to find route to XXX.XXX.68.0", and the scan ends prematurely.
While investigating, I noticed that the target_needs_new_hostgroup function in targets.cc checks for "Different direct connectedness," but the same function in nmap.cc does not. Is this something that should be put there?
I did a small test trying to get --randomize-hosts to mix directly and not-directly connected addresses, but I couldn't get it to work, primarily because I'm on a NAT'ed /24, so I can't specify a single CIDR that contains both types of addresses.
Any thoughts would be appreciated. Dan _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- [bug] nexthost: failed to find route to XXX (directly connected, with --randomize-hosts) Daniel Miller (Mar 26)
- Re: [bug] nexthost: failed to find route to XXX (directly connected, with --randomize-hosts) David Fifield (Mar 27)
- Re: [bug] nexthost: failed to find route to XXX (directly connected, with --randomize-hosts) Daniel Miller (Mar 28)
- Re: [bug] nexthost: failed to find route to XXX (directly connected, with --randomize-hosts) Daniel Miller (Mar 28)
- Re: [bug] nexthost: failed to find route to XXX (directly connected, with --randomize-hosts) David Fifield (Mar 27)