Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: bug nmap 5.51 in windows xp sp 2
From: Rob Nicholls <robert () robnicholls co uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:16:55 +0000
On 25.11.2011 16:08, Ron wrote:
Those ports aren't 'open', they're 'unknown'. I don't know what would cause that, though, I'll leave that up to people who know Nmap's internals.
IIRC you always see it when doing a SYN and service scan against the localhost on Windows. It'll skip the port scan as it can't do the SYN scan against localhost, but the service scan will then run and presumably assign the ports for all the services as unknown (I've not looked at the internals either). It'd be nice if it could skip the service scan if it knows the port scan was skipped for that host.
Ron On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:27:53 +0800 (SGT) Newbie Nux <nux.newbie () yahoo com> wrote:I'm scanning my own Windows XP and get too much ports open. It's happen even in a fresh Windows XP without any other software except the mainboard driver. Here is the scan result in xml. I'm using nmap 5.51 in Windows XP SP 2._______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- bug nmap 5.51 in windows xp sp 2 Newbie Nux (Nov 25)
- Re: bug nmap 5.51 in windows xp sp 2 Ron (Nov 25)
- Re: bug nmap 5.51 in windows xp sp 2 Rob Nicholls (Nov 25)
- Re: bug nmap 5.51 in windows xp sp 2 Ron (Nov 25)