Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: 5.51 - NSE assertion - timeout_msecs
From: Patrick Donnelly <batrick () batbytes com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 15:34:05 -0400
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:31 PM, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:30:10PM -0400, Patrick Donnelly wrote:Well the code says: nu->timeout = luaL_checkint(L, 2); if ((int) nu->timeout < -1) return luaL_error(L, "Negative timeout: %d", nu->timeout); Should that be "<= -1" or "< 0"?No, -1 means no timeout. It's a special case in msevent_new.
I thought so. I'll add a comment to that code to prevent future confusion. -- - Patrick Donnelly _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- 5.51 - NSE assertion - timeout_msecs Vlatko Kosturjak (Apr 04)
- Re: 5.51 - NSE assertion - timeout_msecs David Fifield (Apr 05)
- Re: 5.51 - NSE assertion - timeout_msecs Patrick Donnelly (Apr 05)
- Re: 5.51 - NSE assertion - timeout_msecs David Fifield (Apr 05)
- Re: 5.51 - NSE assertion - timeout_msecs Patrick Donnelly (Apr 05)
- Re: 5.51 - NSE assertion - timeout_msecs David Fifield (Apr 05)
- Re: 5.51 - NSE assertion - timeout_msecs Patrick Donnelly (Apr 05)
- Re: 5.51 - NSE assertion - timeout_msecs David Fifield (Apr 05)
- Re: 5.51 - NSE assertion - timeout_msecs Vlatko Kosturjak (Apr 05)