Re: version check in nfs-ls?

[Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>]

Djalal,

Confirmed, this fixes the issue. Thanks!

Dan

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz () opendz org> wrote:

> On 2011-04-08 14:24:50 -0500, Daniel Miller wrote:
> > Hey list,
> >
> > Ran across an issue with nfs-ls while scanning my HP printer (I was
> > surprised to see that it had NFS on it!). Here's what I was seeing:
> >
> > $ sudo nmap --script rpcinfo -p 111,2049 -sU 192.168.1.X
> > > Starting Nmap 5.51SVN ( http://nmap.org ) at 2011-04-08 14:12 CDT
> > > Nmap scan report for 192.168.1.X
> > > Host is up (0.00092s latency).
> > > PORT     STATE  SERVICE
> > > 111/udp  open   rpcbind
> > > | rpcinfo:
> > > |   program version   port/proto  service
> > > |   100000  2,2,3,3    34861/udp  rpcbind
> > > |   100000  2,3        34861/112  rpcbind
> > > |   100003  2           2049/112  nfs
> > > |   100003  2           2049/udp  nfs
> > > |   100005 1 34862/112  mountd
> > > |_  100005  1          34862/udp  mountd
> > > 2049/udp open  nfs
> > > MAC Address: 00:17:08:XX:XX:XX (Hewlett Packard)
> > >
> > > Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.15 seconds
> > > $ sudo nmap --script nfs-ls -p 111,2049 -sU 192.168.1.X
> > >
> > > Starting Nmap 5.51SVN ( http://nmap.org ) at 2011-04-08 14:07 CDT
> > > Nmap scan report for 192.168.1.X
> > > Host is up (0.0027s latency).
> > > PORT     STATE  SERVICE
> > > 111/udp  open   rpcbind
> > > | nfs-ls:
> > > |   Arguments:
> > > |     maxfiles: 10 (file listing output limited)
> > > |
> > > |   NFS Export /hpmnt/dsk_ram0
> > > |_  ERROR: versions mismatch, nfs v2 - mount v1
> > > 2049/udp open  nfs
> > > MAC Address: 00:17:08:XX:XX:XX (Hewlett Packard)
> > >
> > > Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.22 seconds
> >
> > I'm not sure why this version discrepancy matters. I found the check in
> > nfs-ls.nse:
> Dan I've committed a patch as svn r22944, it should fix the problem. Can
> you please test it ?
>
> --
> tixxdz
> http://opendz.org
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/