Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Nmap usage considered but rejected for Tron: Legacy
From: Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:16:36 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:26:13 +0300 Shinnok <admin () shinnok com> wrote:
Uhaa..that's a great chance for this GSoC for a project to turn Nmap into a killing beast that can scan for open *processes* on a machine, detect and identify processes and then have the ability to kill the rogue ones. Hurr up, there's only so little time till the GSoC application deadline. Hell, I think I will propose that too. :-)
smb-enum-processes can do half of it and smb-psexec can do the rest. Just sayin' :) Ron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2cvBcACgkQ2t2zxlt4g/TahACg2bPSKpt0Ws0zEmbgI6Pea3j/ EpsAnRaDfjIUNcLkFgbn93HNgXQJFM/U =8li0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Nmap usage considered but rejected for Tron: Legacy Fyodor (Apr 06)
- Re: Nmap usage considered but rejected for Tron: Legacy Shinnok (Apr 06)
- Re: Nmap usage considered but rejected for Tron: Legacy Shinnok (Apr 06)
- Re: Nmap usage considered but rejected for Tron: Legacy Ron (Apr 06)
- Re: Nmap usage considered but rejected for Tron: Legacy Shinnok (Apr 06)