Re: Nmap comprehensive scan problem via Armitage

[Asif Iqbal <vadud3 () gmail com>]

On Jun 22, 2011 9:23 PM, "Fyodor" <fyodor () insecure org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:23:50AM +0300, Shinnok wrote:
> > On 06/20/2011 10:08 PM, David Fifield wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 04:26:43PM -0700, Fyodor wrote:
> > > > Great point! As Shinook noted, there are some default scripts which
> > > > don't match this query. So maybe "default or (discovery and safe)"
> > > > would be better. Thee are default scripts which aren't in both
discovery
> > > > and safe categories:
> > >
> > > Shinnok, please make this change in
share/zenmap/config/scan_profile.usp
> > > and document it in CHANGELOG.
> >
> > Done. discovery and safe it is.
>
> Actually, when David said "discovery and safe", that is an exact
> argument taken by --script which selects scripts which are in both the
> discovery AND safe categories (98 scripts). Your version allows all
> scripts which are in either discovery OR the safe categories (158
> scripts). And we want to include scripts in the default category too.
> So, as shown above, I think we should use:
>
> --script "default or (discovery and safe)"
>
> But I'm not certain that double quotes like that in scan_profile.usp
> will be OK. Can you try it out on Linux and Windows and check it in
> if it works?
>
> Thanks,
> Fyodor
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/