Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: XML XLS transform changes - summary of changes from 2b to 2c - committed today
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 09:50:58 -0800
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 05:38:51PM -0600, Tom Sellers wrote:
I have just committed the updates to the nmap XML output XSL transform. This list below is a summary of changes from when the update began on 11/11. A few of these changes were committed 11/14, but most have only been submitted to the list.
Nice work Tom.
Open items: 1. Device types - currently have issues with output data consistency and formatting when pulling a distinct list.
I don't know what you mean.
2. What criteria / counts should be used in situations described below? For example, how many fingerprints are too many? How do we know if the fingerprint is high enough quality to submit given that it may just be present due to the use of -v or -d?
Too many perfect matches is more than 8 (output.cc). Submission-quality prints have the test and value SCAN.G=Y, but this probably won't be easy to test in the XSL. Good fingerprints are also wrapped with "OS:" prefixes. See the isGoodFP and wrapit parameters to write_merged_fpr.
3. Does the OS fingerprint need to be printed (to paper/PDF) at all? The only scenario that I could think of where this would be useful would be if the file was 'printed' to digital media such as PDF.
I think I'd err towards keeping the screen and print versions more similar (including the fingerprints) to reduce possible surprise. It's true that a fingerprint on paper isn't much use to anybody. But as you say, someone could copy and paste from a PDF.
4. Does the table of ports need to be changed so that closed and and filtered ports are always printed (to paper/PDF) as opposed to printing in the format that is currently displayed? My concern here is processes that automatically convert documents, for example to PDF format.
I think it's best to choose a good default display, as you have done, and then print what is currently displayed. You can always comment the XSL file to show what to change if you want to always display all ports. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- XML XLS transform changes - summary of changes from 2b to 2c - committed today Tom Sellers (Dec 28)
- Re: XML XLS transform changes - summary of changes from 2b to 2c - committed today David Fifield (Dec 29)