Re: SMB parallelization

[Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:48:12 -0700 David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:
> I think I understand the technque you are using. I would be concerned
> that it could fail just by chance with large numbers of connections,
> but your testing with Brandon shows that it's not much of a worry.
> Feel free to commit it.
>
> David Fifield
Thanks, it's committed. 

One of the original ideas was to use no more than 10 connections (with a semaphore or something), but that seems like 
it would have a better chance of failing. By detecting errors and waiting, I think we're handling this in a pretty 
clean way. 

Ron

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkypCnIACgkQ2t2zxlt4g/SN8ACePYrjYSPpdKJ3qKEy3EkHRXTE
arwAoJeD3+efTISG8xQybXJelMZLG9+B
=vs0K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/