Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [nmap-svn] r19919 - ncat
From: venkat sanaka <venkatsanaka () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:20:11 +0530
Hi David I just checked the r13962, in which I committed this code. Sorry, it was a mistake. I couldn't remember exactly why i put 7 instead of 8, but i think it was because of this old code. - if (nbytes < 7) - bye("Connection to SOCKS4 proxy failed: Invalid SOCKS4 response."); Regards Venkat On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:00 AM, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:28:10PM -0700, commit-mailer@insecure.orgwrote:Author: david Date: Sat Aug 21 22:28:10 2010 New Revision: 19919 Log: Change the length of a socks4 response to 8 (was 7). I'm not sure why it
was 7
in the first place. Conecting through a "ssh -D" proxy, the proxy was
returning
8 bytes, Ncat was reading the first 7 and passing the 8th on to the data connection. Modified: ncat/ncat_connect.c Modified: ncat/ncat_connect.c
==============================================================================
--- ncat/ncat_connect.c (original) +++ ncat/ncat_connect.c Sat Aug 21 22:28:10 2010 @@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ } else if (socksconnect.storage.ss_family != AF_UNSPEC) { struct socket_buffer stateful_buf; struct socks4_data socks4msg; - char socksbuf[7]; + char socksbuf[8]; connect_socket = do_connect(SOCK_STREAM); if (connect_socket == -1) { @@ -579,9 +579,9 @@ loguser("Error sending proxy request: %s.\n",
socket_strerror(socket_errno()));
return 1; } - /* The size of the socks4 response is 7 bytes. So read
exactly
- 7 bytes from the buffer */ - if (socket_buffer_readcount(&stateful_buf, socksbuf, 7) <
0) {
+ /* The size of the socks4 response is 8 bytes. So read
exactly
+ 8 bytes from the buffer */ + if (socket_buffer_readcount(&stateful_buf, socksbuf, 8) <
0) {
loguser("Error: short reponse from proxy.\n"); return 1; }Venkat, I believe that you implemented this. Do you remember why you had it reading only 7 bytes instead of 8? Was is just a mistake? David Fifield
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: [nmap-svn] r19919 - ncat David Fifield (Aug 21)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r19919 - ncat venkat sanaka (Aug 23)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r19919 - ncat David Fifield (Aug 23)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r19919 - ncat venkat sanaka (Aug 23)