Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Nmap Payloads from a File Patch
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 12:55:42 -0600
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 06:01:22PM -0400, jrf wrote:
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 03:49:45PM -0500, Kris Katterjohn wrote:It looks like your patch accidentally reverts my scan_engine.cc changes from r17532.Attached is a patch for nmap using file based payloads that is with more current sources.
Thanks, Jay, this is committed now. It sure is easy to add a new payload. I did a lot of miscellaneous formatting cleanup on the patch. But I also noticed a couple of substantive changes. It seems you left out port 44400 for the Quake 3 port, so I added that. The new nmap-payloads file had the specification "520,222" for the RIP probe, while it was only defined for 520 in payload.cc. I've changed it back to "520". Was that left over from testing or something? David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Nmap Payloads from a File Patch jrf (May 16)
- Re: Nmap Payloads from a File Patch Kris Katterjohn (May 16)
- Re: Nmap Payloads from a File Patch jrf (May 16)
- Re: Nmap Payloads from a File Patch jrf (May 16)
- Re: Nmap Payloads from a File Patch David Fifield (May 25)
- Re: Nmap Payloads from a File Patch jrf (May 25)
- Re: Nmap Payloads from a File Patch Kris Katterjohn (May 16)