Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: POC Payloader dat
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:41:29 -0700
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:36:58PM -0500, Jay Fink wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:43 PM, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:It also handles inline comments gracefully. What I have left is: - the key matching uses strstr, it shouldn't do that for obvious reasons :) needs changed - assigning dports - assigning sports - making sure memory is dealt with gracefully/correctlyLooks great! I'm eager to see the finished product. Remember that we'll be looking up payloads not by name, but by protocol/port, so see if you can make your test program work like this: $ ./payload 53 udp \x00\x00\x10\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00Ah okay, I was thinking we would still use a payload_name field but now that I think of it IIRC we tossed that and having multiple payloads/port (at least for now) in favor of *just getting the payloads out* :)
You can keep the payload names--that might be useful in the future. It's just that we won't be looking them up that way. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Jan 12)
- Re: POC Payloader dat David Fifield (Jan 12)
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Jan 12)
- Re: POC Payloader dat David Fifield (Jan 12)
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Jan 13)
- Re: POC Payloader dat David Fifield (Jan 13)
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Jan 15)
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Jan 12)
- Re: POC Payloader dat David Fifield (Jan 12)