Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: POC Payloader dat
From: Jay Fink <jay.fink () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:01:03 -0500
So I don't like the label, I am going to push that back to the loader (somehow :) - so the new format would be more like unicornscan but less the payload group: /* PROTOCOL USABLE_DESTINATION_PORTS_LIST SOURCE_PORT PAYLOAD */ /* radius */ udp 1604,1645,1812 -1 { "\x1e\x00\x01\x30\x02\xfd\xa8\xe3\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00" "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00"; }; What with holidays, new gig and all haven't had much time to look at this but unicornscan uses a mix of lex and c to parse these out - not very striaghtforward to me - so I might look at how nmap loads services etc. for guidance instead. thx, j _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Nov 23)
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Nov 24)
- Re: POC Payloader dat David Fifield (Nov 25)
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Nov 25)
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Nov 30)
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Dec 04)
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Dec 09)
- Re: POC Payloader dat David Fifield (Dec 13)
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Dec 14)
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Dec 19)
- Re: POC Payloader dat David Fifield (Dec 21)
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Dec 22)
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Dec 26)
- Re: POC Payloader dat David Fifield (Dec 27)
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Dec 28)
- Re: POC Payloader dat Jay Fink (Dec 30)
- Re: POC Payloader dat David Fifield (Dec 30)