Re: ftp-capabilities.nse

[Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>]

On 09/17/2009 03:39 PM, Fyodor wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 03:04:49PM -0500, Ron wrote:
> > That sort of leads me to another thought: anybody have feelings about
> > creating an nse category for "experimental" scripts? That is, scripts
> > that more or less work fine but haven't been tested enough to call
> > stable? I've written a lot of scripts in the past few weeks that I post
> > to the list for people to test, but it'd be nice to stick it in svn
> > without having to use a nmap-exp branch. I find things getting lost in
> > the shuffle, since I work on them from at least 3 different systems, and
> > often pass stuff to myself via email. Any opinions on that?
>
> I think an nmap-exp branch is the best way to deal with those.  It
> doesn't necessarily have to be a whole branch of nmap.  It could be
> just nmap-exp/ron-nse just containing your experimental scripts/*.nse
> and nselib/*.lua.  We have a "demo" category, but we're trying to get
> rid of it.  The only remaining script there is smtp-open-relay.nse,
> and I'm going to send an email about that one shortly.
>
> Cheers,
> -F

Sure, that works.

On that topic, I noticed that http://nmap.org/svn isn't always up to 
date with the actual svn. From what I understand, it's updated when you 
update the NSEDoc, I think? Is there any chance of automating that 
process so it happens at every commit (or every hour), or is there some 
reason not to do that?

(It's not a big deal, it's just nice having a http:// link to scripts 
right away)

Ron


_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org