Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Last FreeBSD Ports Patch for a bit
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:51:33 -0700
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 06:17:15PM -0400, Jay Fink wrote:
All, Turns out the only patch from freebsd-current ports that can go into nmap-current is one similar to the last, the rest of the patches are already in or not needed. Tested on FreeBSD-current and
[...]
-#ifdef WIN32 +#if defined(WIN32) || (defined(FREEBSD) && (__FreeBSD_version < 500000)) apcopy = ap; #else va_copy(apcopy, ap); /* Needed in case we need to do a second vsnprintf */
Thanks Jay. Does FreeBSD before 5.0 lack va_copy(), or is there some other reason this is done? Maybe what we should really do is test for va_copy in configure (and leave it undefined on Windows) and then change this section into a HAVE_VA_COPY define test. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Last FreeBSD Ports Patch for a bit Jay Fink (Sep 24)
- Re: Last FreeBSD Ports Patch for a bit Fyodor (Sep 25)
- Re: Last FreeBSD Ports Patch for a bit Jay Fink (Sep 25)
- Re: Last FreeBSD Ports Patch for a bit Daniel Roethlisberger (Sep 25)
- Re: Last FreeBSD Ports Patch for a bit Jay Fink (Sep 25)
- Re: Last FreeBSD Ports Patch for a bit Fyodor (Sep 25)