Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Traceroute failure from SVN 15553 on OSX 10.5.8
From: Tom Sellers <nmap () fadedcode net>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:13:00 -0500
David Fifield wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:08:22AM -0500, Chris Clements wrote:Receiving a failure message when traceroute starts from the following command:nmap -Avv -T5 192.168.0.0/24 (FYI, all machines in this range are on local layer 2 subnet)Failure message: Initiating Traceroute at 11:07Stats: 0:02:46 elapsed; 232 hosts completed (24 up), 24 undergoing TracerouteTraceroute Timing: About 1.39% done; ETC: 11:07 (0:00:00 remaining)Assertion failed: (current_ttl > 0), function next_ttl, file traceroute.cc, line 397.Abort trapThank you for this report. Does the attached patch fix the problem? It may be that OS detection is wrongly detecting a distance of 0 for one of the hosts (whichever follows 192.168.0.253). The traceroute should always start with a TTL of 1 at the minimum. David Fifield
David - The only host with a legitimate 0 value should be localhost right? Chris - What is the IP the scanning machine? Tom _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Traceroute failure from SVN 15553 on OSX 10.5.8 Chris Clements (Sep 23)
- Re: Traceroute failure from SVN 15553 on OSX 10.5.8 David Fifield (Sep 23)
- Re: Traceroute failure from SVN 15553 on OSX 10.5.8 Tom Sellers (Sep 24)
- Re: Traceroute failure from SVN 15553 on OSX 10.5.8 David Fifield (Sep 24)
- Re: Traceroute failure from SVN 15553 on OSX 10.5.8 Tom Sellers (Sep 25)
- Message not available
- Re: Traceroute failure from SVN 15553 on OSX 10.5.8 David Fifield (Sep 27)
- Re: Traceroute failure from SVN 15553 on OSX 10.5.8 Tom Sellers (Sep 24)
- Re: Traceroute failure from SVN 15553 on OSX 10.5.8 David Fifield (Sep 23)