Nmap Development mailing list archives
NMAP scans detect all hosts active in a subnet, when in really not!
From: "Darren Shady" <Darren.Shady () sunh com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:23:54 -0600
Greetings, I'm not too sure what's going on here. Nmap 10.62.0.0/24 -s P results in the following exerpt: Host 10.62.0.246 is up (0.00s latency). Host 10.62.0.247 is up (0.00s latency). Host 10.62.0.248 is up (0.016s latency). Host 10.62.0.249 is up (0.00s latency). Host 10.62.0.250 is up (0.00s latency). Host 10.62.0.251 is up (0.00s latency). Host 10.62.0.252 is up (0.00s latency). Host 10.62.0.253 is up (0.00s latency). Host 10.62.0.254 is up (0.00s latency). Host 10.62.0.255 is up (0.016s latency). Nmap done: 256 IP addresses (256 hosts up) scanned in 2.11 seconds C:\Documents and Settings\dshady>nmap -V Nmap version 5.00 ( http://nmap.org ) This subnet does not have 256 hosts up, I know it to have only a few active hosts. This is a new problem. Any suggestions? C:\Documents and Settings\dshady>ver Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] Darren Shady IT Infrastructure Network Engineer L|PT,E|CSA, C|EH, C|HFI, CCNA, MCSE, MCSA, MCDST, Security+, A+, Net+, I-Net+ Sun Healthcare Group, Inc. 505-468-5489 - Office 505-553-2414 - Mobile This e-mail and any attachments may be privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please delete it and do not read, distribute, or reproduce it. The unauthorized use of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- NMAP scans detect all hosts active in a subnet, when in really not! Darren Shady (Sep 21)
- Re: NMAP scans detect all hosts active in a subnet, when in really not! David Fifield (Sep 22)