Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Conficker scanning with nmap
From: Lionel Cons <lionel.cons () cern ch>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:28:14 +0200
David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> writes:
I think we should just avoid calling EVP_EncryptUpdate when data_len == 0.
I fully support this. Nmap (including the OpenSSL LUA library) should not crash so easily. The comment associated with the OpenSSL patch is very relevant: Check-in [17371]: Don't use assertions to check application-provided arguments; and don't unnecessarily fail on input size 0. Cheers, Lionel _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: Conficker scanning with nmap Lionel Cons (Apr 01)
- Re: Conficker scanning with nmap Brandon Enright (Apr 01)
- Re: Conficker scanning with nmap Lionel Cons (Apr 01)
- Re: Conficker scanning with nmap David Fifield (Apr 01)
- Re: Conficker scanning with nmap Ron (Apr 01)
- Re: Conficker scanning with nmap David Fifield (Apr 01)
- Re: Conficker scanning with nmap Lionel Cons (Apr 02)
- Re: Conficker scanning with nmap Ron (Apr 02)
- Re: Conficker scanning with nmap Brandon Enright (Apr 01)