Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Ncrack initial draft specifications
From: Brandon Enright <bmenrigh () ucsd edu>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 23:41:11 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 2 May 2009 02:23:24 +0300 ithilgore - <ithilgore.ryu.l () gmail com> wrote: ...snip...
First of all, since we should get all the existing tools' best ideas and maybe the most representative of them is thc-hydra, I have been studying its source code to see how its internals work. Below follow some notes I took.
I haven't read the rest of your email yet but I should point out that you might also want to look at Medusa's design and code: http://www.foofus.net/jmk/medusa/medusa.html The author of Medusa seems to think that Hydra isn't designed as well as it could be which is why he wrote Medusa. Brandon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkn7iJ0ACgkQqaGPzAsl94KHIACgmc+lI8Z7I6CKvBDgDq8e45er G2YAnjLNLxiJ2sauo4ochmNGKmYmSFHo =8OGd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Ncrack initial draft specifications ithilgore - (May 01)
- Re: Ncrack initial draft specifications Brandon Enright (May 01)