Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [PATCH] Mass rDNS performance
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:21:14 -0700
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 07:19:41AM +0000, Brandon Enright wrote:
When I resolve 16384 randomly generated IPs that all have a reverse name (I reverse resolved 1 million, extracted 16384 with a name) the current code is quite a bit slower.
Hi Brandon. Thanks for helping out with large scale testing of the patch! Did you compare the accuracy of the 16,384 reverse-resolves (e.g. what percentage succeeded, since it sounds like they all should have in an ideal case) between the patched and unpatched versions? Performance alone only tells half the story. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- [PATCH] Mass rDNS performance jah (Mar 18)
- Re: [PATCH] Mass rDNS performance Brandon Enright (Mar 19)
- Re: [PATCH] Mass rDNS performance Fyodor (Mar 19)
- Re: [PATCH] Mass rDNS performance Brandon Enright (Mar 19)
- Re: [PATCH] Mass rDNS performance Brandon Enright (Mar 19)
- Re: [PATCH] Mass rDNS performance Brandon Enright (Mar 19)
- Re: [PATCH] Mass rDNS performance jah (Mar 19)
- Re: [PATCH] Mass rDNS performance Fyodor (Mar 19)
- Re: [PATCH] Mass rDNS performance Brandon Enright (Mar 19)