Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Google/Nmap SoC 2009 Project Ideas?
From: Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:33:03 -0500
Vlatko Kosturjak wrote:
That's already implemented, to a point, with runlevels. For example, my smb-brute.nse script will run before other smb-* scripts.Fyodor wrote: Some of the ideas: 1) Implementation of phases in scripting Engine. e.g. that some scripts can be executed on the end of all port scans and when all other scripts are finished.
Something I'd kind of like, though, is two-way interaction between scripts, so scripts can "work together". I don't think that's reasonable to expect, though, it'd get sticky fast.
2) Implementation of script only execution (possibility to pass open ports/services on command line).
Or just tell it which scripts to run. On that note, I'd be interested in wildcards for specifying scripts. $ nmap --script=smb-* ... Ron _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: Google/Nmap SoC 2009 Project Ideas?, (continued)
- Re: Google/Nmap SoC 2009 Project Ideas? Daniel Roethlisberger (Mar 11)
- Re: Google/Nmap SoC 2009 Project Ideas? Henri Salo (Mar 14)
- Re: Google/Nmap SoC 2009 Project Ideas? David Fifield (Mar 14)
- Re: Google/Nmap SoC 2009 Project Ideas? Daniel Roethlisberger (Mar 14)
- Re: Google/Nmap SoC 2009 Project Ideas? David Fifield (Mar 14)
- Re: Google/Nmap SoC 2009 Project Ideas? Daniel Roethlisberger (Mar 14)
- Re: Google/Nmap SoC 2009 Project Ideas? Fyodor (Mar 14)
- Re: Google/Nmap SoC 2009 Project Ideas? Ron (Mar 11)
- Re: Google/Nmap SoC 2009 Project Ideas? Vlatko Kosturjak (Mar 12)