Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: [PATCH] Extended SSL support in Nmap


From: Kristof Boeynaems <kristof.boeynaems () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:14:12 +0100

Kristof Boeynaems wrote:
<snip>

Below the results:
1.
- Nmap done: 100 IP addresses (100 hosts up) scanned in 525.38 seconds
          Raw packets sent: 1002 (44.088KB) | Rcvd: 311 (13.676KB)
- Number of open SSL ports detected and successfully investigated (' ssl/something'): 36 - Number of open SSL ports detected and not successfully investigated ('ssl/unknown'): 8 - Number of the open 'ssl/unknown' ports that returned a new fingerprint: 2

2.
- Nmap done: 100 IP addresses (100 hosts up) scanned in 534.91 seconds
          Raw packets sent: 1005 (44.220KB) | Rcvd: 320 (14.044KB)
- Number of open SSL ports detected and successfully investigated (' ssl/something'): 37 - Number of open SSL ports detected and not successfully investigated ('ssl/unknown'): 7 - Number of the open 'ssl/unknown' ports that returned a new fingerprint: 2

3.
- Nmap done: 100 IP addresses (100 hosts up) scanned in 517.12 seconds
          Raw packets sent: 1000 (44.000KB) | Rcvd: 306 (13.436KB)
- Number of open SSL ports detected and succesfully investigated (' ssl/something'): 35 - Number of open SSL ports detected and not successfully investigated ('ssl/unknown'): 8 - Number of the open 'ssl/unknown' ports that returned a new fingerprint: 2


The number of 'ssl/unknown's in 3. is a copy-paste error. It should be '2' instead of '8'.

Cheers,

Kristof

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org


Current thread: