Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: nmap and routing problems
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:13:17 -0700
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 08:38:42PM +0200, Peter Gordon wrote:
Progress has been made ! I ran the latest version of nmap -4.85BETA3: ./nmap -e eth0 --unprivileged 10.10.10.71 and received the message "Host seems down". The problem is with the socket connection. The -e flag doesn't seem to be doing anything. What it should be doing is a bind to the IP of the requested port. Without -e option connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(80), sin_addr=inet_addr("10.10.10.71")}, 16) = -1 ENETUNREACH (Network is unreachable) With -e option connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(80), sin_addr=inet_addr("10.10.10.71")}, 16) = -1 ENETUNREACH (Network is unreachable)
I'm surprised you can create any kind of socket connection at all. ping might be a special case because it uses raw sockets. Are you able to make a connection with Ncat? ncat 10.10.10.71 80 ncat -s 10.19.1.30 10.10.10.71 80 Even if port 80 is not open, you should get back a "connection refused" or "connection timeout", not "network is unreachable". Try running strace with those commands and see what happens. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- nmap and routing problems Peter Gordon (Feb 18)
- Re: nmap and routing problems David Fifield (Feb 18)
- Re: nmap and routing problems Peter Gordon (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems David Fifield (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems Peter Gordon (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems kx (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems David Fifield (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems David Fifield (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems Peter Gordon (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems Peter Gordon (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems David Fifield (Feb 18)