Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Nping development
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:20:40 -0700
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:57:14AM +0100, Henri Doreau wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I've opened a project on sourceforge under the name of APing2. There is nothing really interesting yet but I hope that it will reach the required quality level soon. I would have opinions about some options. hping2 has "modes" you can call typing -1, -2... But nmap and ncat use -6 to enable ipv6, that might be confusing. What would you prefer : give priority to nmap like options (and rename the original hping2 modes) or hping2 ones (and rename the ipv6 flag), in this case I mean.
I didn't have the idea for Nping so I can't answer specific questions about requirements. I see at http://nmap.org/SoC/Ncat.html that "Some flags may use the Nmap-style option name rather than hping-style." You'll have to wait to see what others have to say on this one. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Nping development Henri Doreau (Dec 16)
- Re: Nping development David Fifield (Dec 28)
- Re: Nping development Henri Doreau (Dec 30)
- Re: Nping development David Fifield (Dec 31)
- Re: Nping development Kris Katterjohn (Dec 31)
- Re: Nping development Henri Doreau (Dec 30)
- Re: Nping development David Fifield (Dec 28)