Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: 24-Hour Beta: Nmap 4.69BETA1
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 16:07:21 -0600
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 10:24:42PM +0100, Rob Nicholls wrote:
Strange, mine seems to be behaving properly (first scan was using nmap's default range of ports and picked 113, second was only against port 80):
It picked 113 because 113 is a closed port, and closed ports are "better" in Nmap's view than open ports because they don't have a risk of SYN flooding. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- 24-Hour Beta: Nmap 4.69BETA1 Fyodor (Sep 07)
- Re: 24-Hour Beta: Nmap 4.69BETA1 Alan Jones (Sep 07)
- Re: 24-Hour Beta: Nmap 4.69BETA1 Alan Jones (Sep 07)
- RE: 24-Hour Beta: Nmap 4.69BETA1 Rob Nicholls (Sep 07)
- Re: 24-Hour Beta: Nmap 4.69BETA1 David Fifield (Sep 07)
- Re: 24-Hour Beta: Nmap 4.69BETA1 David Fifield (Sep 07)
- Re: 24-Hour Beta: Nmap 4.69BETA1 Alan Jones (Sep 07)
- Re: 24-Hour Beta: Nmap 4.69BETA1 Fyodor (Sep 07)
- Re: 24-Hour Beta: Nmap 4.69BETA1 Alan Jones (Sep 13)
- Re: 24-Hour Beta: Nmap 4.69BETA1 Alan Jones (Sep 07)
- Re: 24-Hour Beta: Nmap 4.69BETA1 David Fifield (Sep 07)
- Re: 24-Hour Beta: Nmap 4.69BETA1 Alan Jones (Sep 07)
- Re: 24-Hour Beta: Nmap 4.69BETA1 David Fifield (Sep 07)
- Re: 24-Hour Beta: Nmap 4.69BETA1 Alan Jones (Sep 07)
- "Nmap Output" tab David Fifield (Sep 07)