Re: Zenmap profiles

[eldraco <eldraco () gmail com>]

Hi all, 

What about adding some sort of "Full Port Scan" or something scanning all 
65536 tcp ports? I usually add it by hand.
What about an udp quick scan? it's sometimes overlook and it's usually 
important

cherrs

eldraco

El Monday 25 August 2008 00:26:32 David Fifield escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> Vladimir is going to post some big Zenmap news before long, so before
> that happens and takes all your attention I'd like you to consider a
> smaller issue.
>
> Zenmap ships with a number of scan profiles. The list of profiles has
> remained essentially unchanged for a year or more. I want your input on
> which should stay and which should go. Of course a user can always
> create her own profiles, but useful details are a big part of usable
> software. The current list of profiles is
>
>       [Intense Scan]
>       nmap -A -T Aggressive -v <target>
>
>       [Operating System Detection]
>       nmap -v -O <target>
>
>       [Quick Full version Detection Scan]
>       nmap -T Aggressive -O -sV -v -n <target>
>
>       [Quick Operating System detection]
>       nmap -T Aggressive -v -O <target>
>
>       [Quick Scan]
>       nmap -T Aggressive -n -v <target>
>
>       [Quick Services version detection]
>       nmap -T Aggressive -sV -v <target>
>
>       [Quick and verbose scan]
>       nmap -d -T Aggressive --packet-trace -v -n <target>
>
>       [Regular Scan]
>       nmap -v <target>
>
> I think that "Intense Scan", "Quick Scan", and "Regular Scan" should
> stay as they are. I would keep "Quick Services version detection" but
> rename it "Version detection". Delete "Operating System Detection" and
> give that name to "Quick Operating System detection". Keep "Quick and
> verbose scan" but get rid of --packet-trace because that has surprised
> me more than once. Delete "Quick Full version Detection Scan". Then I
> would add
>
>       [Ping scan]
>       nmap -T Aggressive -sP <target>
>
> Those are my recommended changes. Any other suggestions?
>
> Finally, if you have used Zenmap you've probably noticed that it used
> "-T Aggressive" rather than "-T4". I prefer the latter form and it
> matches better with our documentation. It's an easy change to make if
> you agree with me.
>
> David Fifield
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> Archived at http://SecLists.Org



-- 
Ing. Sebastián García
http://minsky.surfnet.nl:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3E42ED27F864EDE6

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org