Nmap Development mailing list archives
-PN reason, localhost isn't really responding
From: "Michael Pattrick" <mpattrick () rhinovirus org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:36:32 -0400
Hey everyone, When scanning a remote host with the no-ping option, Nmap states that the reason the host is up, is due to 'localhost-response'. Kinda silly right? Heres an example: nmap -PN -oX scanme.xml scanme.nmap.org <host starttime="1217268668" endtime="1217268685"><status state="up" reason="localhost-response"/> localhost-responce seems unappropriated(as its a blatant lie - the localhost didn't really respond) but browsing 'portreasons.cc' I couldn't find anything better, the options were: "reset", "conn-refused", "syn-ack", "syn-ack", "udp-response", "proto-response", "perm-denied", "net-unreach", "host-unreach", "proto-unreach", "port-unreach", "echo-reply", "unknown", "unknown", "dest-unreach", "source-quench", "net-prohibited", "host-prohibited", "unknown", "unknown", "admin-prohibited", "unknown", "time-exceeded", "unknown", "unknown", "timestamp-reply", "unknown", "unknown", "unknown", "addressmask-reply", "no-ipid-change", "ipid-change", "arp-response", "tcp-response", "no-response", "localhost-response", "script-set", "unknown-response" I'm thinking about adding something along the lines of 'user-set' or 'user-specified', but I would like to get some opinions on this., any thoughts on a better name? Thanks, Michael _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- -PN reason, localhost isn't really responding Michael Pattrick (Jul 28)
- Re: -PN reason, localhost isn't really responding Fyodor (Jul 28)
- Re: -PN reason, localhost isn't really responding Kris Katterjohn (Jul 28)
- Re: -PN reason, localhost isn't really responding Fyodor (Jul 28)