Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [RFC] NSE Re-categorization
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:44:51 -0700
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:03:30PM +0100, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
They should be either "discovery" and relatively benign or "intrusive" and used with intent. Explain the logic between having a script in both categories. Maybe I just don't "get it."
Well, there are currently three scripts in both "discovery" and "intrusive" categories: HTTP_open_proxy.nse:categories = {"default", "discovery", "intrusive"} MSSQLm.nse:categories = {"default", "discovery", "intrusive"} zoneTrans.nse:categories = {'default', 'intrusive', 'discovery'} What do you think would be a better way to categorize them? Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: [RFC] NSE Re-categorization, (continued)
- Re: [RFC] NSE Re-categorization Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Jun 14)
- Re: [RFC] NSE Re-categorization Kris Katterjohn (Jun 14)
- Re: [RFC] NSE Re-categorization Fyodor (Jun 14)
- Re: [RFC] NSE Re-categorization Kris Katterjohn (Jun 18)
- Re: [RFC] NSE Re-categorization Tom Sellers (Jun 18)
- Re: [RFC] NSE Re-categorization DePriest, Jason R. (Jun 18)
- Re: [RFC] NSE Re-categorization Kris Katterjohn (Jun 18)
- Re: [RFC] NSE Re-categorization DePriest, Jason R. (Jun 18)
- Re: [RFC] NSE Re-categorization Kris Katterjohn (Jun 18)
- Re: [RFC] NSE Re-categorization jah (Jun 18)
- Re: [RFC] NSE Re-categorization Fyodor (Jun 28)