Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [Patch] Eliminate compiler warnings
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:35:43 -0700
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 02:59:45AM +0100, Andrew J. Bennieston wrote:
6. A lot of people don't care about compiler warnings. If nmap follows this tradition, feel free to ignore my patch; at the very least I've familiarised myself with a lot of nmap code in a very short length of time, and it staved off the boredom for a while. On the other hand, I happen to think that warnings are almost as bad as errors, and should be treated as such!
Hi Andrew. I agree that we should remove compiler warnings wherever possible. My Linux boxes don't experience the warnings you seem to get, which is why they weren't dealt with before. Your patch looks good and seems to work fine on my Linux and Windows XP boxes, so I've applied it. Thanks for the patch. As for your other patch, I think the complexity of dynamic memory allocation is overkill for a 128-byte stack variable. Though maybe there are other places where Nmap can benefit from better memory usage optimization. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- [Patch] Eliminate compiler warnings Andrew J. Bennieston (Apr 08)
- Re: [Patch] Eliminate compiler warnings Fyodor (Apr 08)