Re: [NSE] Robots rethink

[jah <jah () zadkiel plus com>]

On 04/06/2008 19:06, Eddie Bell wrote:
> Good idea, the amended version is attached. I've also increased the
> verbose output line length (from 40 to 50) so that less vertical space
> is taken up.

Aye, I think it's great to have the option not to print all the disallow
entries, I like the amendment.
How about a count of disallow entries for non-verbose results?  This
would give an idea as to how interesting the robots.txt file might be
and whether it's worth running the scan with more verbosity.

Regards,

jah

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org