Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning
From: "Razi Shaban" <razishaban () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:34:25 +0200
Great! I'll play around with it later today, if I have any time ill try and work on the algorithm. -- razi On 3/26/08, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 05:19:05PM +0200, Razi Shaban wrote: > What does it do when the user requests more packets than the computer > can physically send? > > I figure a warning of some sort would be better than a crash... It won't crash, it just won't send any faster than the fastest it can send. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning David Fifield (Mar 25)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning Razi Shaban (Mar 26)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning David Fifield (Mar 26)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning Razi Shaban (Mar 26)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning David Fifield (Mar 26)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning Brandon Enright (Mar 26)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning David Fifield (Mar 30)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning Brandon Enright (Mar 30)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning David Fifield (Mar 31)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning David Fifield (Mar 30)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning Razi Shaban (Mar 26)