Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: adding this option?
From: "Eddie Bell" <ejlbell () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:07:50 +0000
Hi Brandon,
The script _is_ useful but provides about the same thing that can be accomplished with a custom service probe and --version-trace.
Yeah I guess you are right. The script is basically my default NSE template where the portrule function is controlled by user parameters and the output is dumped in hex.
In order to make this script really worth it, I think it would need to contain multiple commands like so:
I think the only problem with this is that once you go into the territory of multiple payloads the user may wish to send different data depending on the previous results. At this point you might as well write an NSE script :)
One script that would be really neat would be a -sV implementing NSE script. That is, I could give the script a service probe file and it would send the probes to the ports and run them through PCRE. I really hate mucking with nmap-service-probes when I'm testing a one-off probe/match. Arbitrary limitations could be put on on the custom probe file like only one probe and match or one probe, many matches, etc.
Hmm, this would be possible as we have PCRE support in NSE but would it be significantly different from just editing the service probe file? I think for now I will just resign it to the bit bucket thanks for the comments - eddie _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- adding this option? mike (Jan 13)
- Re: adding this option? DePriest, Jason R. (Jan 13)
- Re: adding this option? Eddie Bell (Jan 15)
- Re: adding this option? Brandon Enright (Jan 15)
- Re: adding this option? Eddie Bell (Jan 15)
- Re: adding this option? Diman Todorov (Feb 01)
- Re: adding this option? Eddie Bell (Jan 15)
- Re: adding this option? DePriest, Jason R. (Jan 13)