Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50?
From: Brandon Enright <bmenrigh () ucsd edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:15:40 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:34:24 +0100 Lionel Cons <lionel.cons () cern ch> wrote:
Eddie Bell writes: > Could one of you try out this patch (or svn) and see if it fixes > the problem. I ran the same command as dave and it worked with the > changes. I've tried the SVN version (6699) and it does fix the problem. Thanks! Lionel
Same here. I was able to resolve 16384 random IPs twice. Thanks for the quick fix Eddie. Brandon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHi8LsqaGPzAsl94IRAteCAJ976w2AL+ixBVlO0JKmTAw3vx76vwCffOwb iihqG+eKhCiq7Y6x1I8ZDtU= =yKlt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? Lionel Cons (Jan 07)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? doug (Jan 13)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? kunwon1 (Jan 13)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? kunwon1 (Jan 13)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? Brandon Enright (Jan 13)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? Eddie Bell (Jan 14)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? Lionel Cons (Jan 14)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? Brandon Enright (Jan 14)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? doug (Jan 13)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? Lionel Cons (Jan 14)
- Re: Bug in Parallel DNS resolution in Nmap 4.50? doug (Jan 14)