Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [Patch] Port and Host State Reasons
From: "Eddie Bell" <ejlbell () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 15:30:22 +0100
Hi Kris, If you are going to port massping to ultra_scan then you may need to move some of the reason code but it is pretty simple so you shouldn't have much trouble. -eddie On 18/05/07, Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com> wrote:
On 5/16/07, Eddie Bell <ejlbell () gmail com> wrote:This patch is an updated version of one I wrote last year. Essentially it gives you packet level detail as to why a port is deemed to be in a particulate state. It is activated with the --reason switch and supports all scan/ping types.Good job! I haven't run into any problems with it (and I plan on testing it out more from your branch soon). Thanks, Kris Katterjohn
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- [Patch] Port and Host State Reasons Eddie Bell (May 16)
- Re: [Patch] Port and Host State Reasons David Fifield (May 16)
- Re: [Patch] Port and Host State Reasons Eddie Bell (May 18)
- RE: [Patch] Port and Host State Reasons Thomas Buchanan (May 18)
- Re: [Patch] Port and Host State Reasons Eddie Bell (May 18)
- Re: [Patch] Port and Host State Reasons Eddie Bell (May 19)
- Re: [Patch] Port and Host State Reasons Eddie Bell (May 18)
- Re: [Patch] Port and Host State Reasons David Fifield (May 16)
- Re: [Patch] Port and Host State Reasons Kris Katterjohn (May 18)
- Re: [Patch] Port and Host State Reasons Eddie Bell (May 18)