Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark
From: "Hans Nilsson" <hasse_gg () ftml net>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:12:16 -1100
He could have tried to use Nmap against the individual ports in the last test, like he did with SinFP. Even though it supposedly is "MUCH less reliable" it would have been an interesting comparison. On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 23:56:33 +0100, "GomoR" <nmap-hackers () gomor org> said:
Hi, I told the author to re-test using latest Nmap, and here are the results: http://www.phocean.net/index.php/post/2006/12/24/Updated-%3A-SinFP-205-and-Nmap-420 Best regards, -- ^ ___ ___ http://www.GomoR.org/ <-+ | / __ |__/ Systems & Security Engineer | | \__/ | \ ---[ zsh$ alias psed='perl -pe ' ]--- | +--> Net::Frame <=> http://search.cpan.org/~gomor/ <---+ _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
-- Hans Nilsson hasse_gg () ftml net -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but differentÂ… _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark GomoR (Dec 27)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark Hans Nilsson (Dec 27)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Dec 27)
- RE: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark Sina Bahram (Dec 27)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark DePriest, Jason R. (Dec 28)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark Hans Nilsson (Dec 28)
- RE: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark Sina Bahram (Dec 27)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark doug (Dec 28)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark Hans Nilsson (Dec 28)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark doug (Dec 28)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark Hans Nilsson (Dec 29)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark GomoR (Dec 28)