Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: More Service Detection Notes (Skype)
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:37:37 -0700
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 12:25:58AM -0700, doug () hcsw org wrote:
What do you think about an addition to the nmap-service-probes format that requires multiple match lines having to be triggered in order to report a result? Specifically, do you (or anyone else) see anything wrong with the following:
That does look like a clever mechanism. But I'm concerned about adding too much complexity to the system. Maybe it would be best to let the upcoming scripting system deal with service detection for these especially tough cases.
Probe TCP GetRequest q|GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n| ... match &skype2 m|^HTTP/1\.0 404 Not Found\r\n\r\n$| p/Skype v2/
Has anyone discovered any URLs which don't give 404 errors? What sort of URLs are seen when you sniff a skype connection? Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Current thread:
- More Service Detection Notes doug (Jul 25)
- Re: More Service Detection Notes (Skype) Brandon Enright (Jul 25)
- Re: More Service Detection Notes (Skype) doug (Jul 26)
- Re: More Service Detection Notes (Skype) Brandon Enright (Jul 26)
- Re: More Service Detection Notes (Skype) Fyodor (Jul 27)
- Re: More Service Detection Notes (Skype) Brandon Enright (Jul 27)
- Re: More Service Detection Notes (Skype) doug (Jul 26)
- Re: More Service Detection Notes (Skype) Brandon Enright (Jul 25)
- Re: More Service Detection Notes Fyodor (Aug 01)
- Re: More Service Detection Notes doug (Aug 01)
- Re: More Service Detection Notes Brandon Enright (Aug 02)
- Re: More Service Detection Notes Fyodor (Aug 02)