Nmap Development mailing list archives
RE: Nmap 4.11: False positive ping results
From: "Mike C (sec)" <check () imjc com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:27:15 +0100
Curious - why do you say the bug was already fixed? Isn't nmap 4.11 a later version than nmap 4.10? In fact, isn't nmap 4.11 "the latest Nmap on Windows" (excluding the 4.20 Alpha's) - which Vitaly says is broke? Regards, Mike -----Original Message----- From: nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org [mailto:nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org] On Behalf Of Martin Macok Sent: 22 July 2006 11:20 To: nmap-dev () insecure org Subject: Re: Nmap 4.11: False positive ping results On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 03:55:27PM -0500, Vitaly McLain wrote:
1. Nmap 4.03 and Nmap 4.11, under Windows XP SP1 and SP2, reported all 254 hosts as up. 2. Angry IP Scanner reports 2 hosts as being up, even after being made
less
angry (slowed down). 3. Nmap 4.10 under Linux (kernel 2.4.25) says 22 hosts are up. Number #3 (Nmap/Linux) is the only correct answer!
So it means the bug was already fixed so I don't think anybody is interested unless the latest Nmap on Windows still has the bug. In that case use "-vvv -d --packet-trace" options and send the output to us. You don't need to scan all C class network, one IP that should be "down" and Nmap is reporting it is "up" is enough to debug the problem, anyway. Martin Mačok ICT Security Consultant _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Current thread:
- Nmap 4.11: False positive ping results Vitaly McLain (Jul 21)
- Re: Nmap 4.11: False positive ping results Martin Mačok (Jul 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Nmap 4.11: False positive ping results Mike C (sec) (Jul 25)
- Re: Nmap 4.11: False positive ping results 'Martin Macok' (Jul 25)