RE: Nmap scanning issue / pings?

["Joshua Perrymon" <josh.perrymon () purehacking com>]

The other 2 *nix boxes have 4.0.3 installed as well. So I'm seeing this
across the LAN.

The scans return as filtered unless I add the -P0 switch.

JP


 



-----Original Message-----
From: Ramy [mailto:bootuikey () gmail com] 
Sent: Thursday, 18 May 2006 10:11 PM
To: nmap-dev () insecure org
Subject: Re:Nmap scanning issue / pings?


On 5/17/06, Joshua Perrymon  wrote:

*>*Hey Guys,

*>*I'm setting up a test network for our lab..
*>*I'm testing outbound scans using Nmap to verify device *>*configuration
so on... *>*If I ping 1.1.1.1 for instance, I get a reply.. ( 1.1.1.1 is
obfuscated )

*>*C:\Documents and Settings\yo>ping 1.1.1.1
*>*Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
*>*Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=238
*>*If I nmap the device It says ports are filtered..( I know telnet is
*>*open)

*>*:\Documents and Settings\yo>nmap 1.1.1.1 -p 2

You should always try the new version of nmap,now it's nmap 4.03.

nmap  1.1.1.1 -p 23

*Starting Nmap 4.03 (
**http://www.insecure.org/nmap*<http://www.insecure.org/nmap>
* ) at 2006-05-18 19:27
Interesting ports on 1.1.1.1:
PORT   STATE SERVICE
23/tcp open  telnet*

*Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 32.969 seconds*

*nmap 1.1.1.1 -p 23 -P0*

*Starting Nmap 4.03 (
**http://www.insecure.org/nmap*<http://www.insecure.org/nmap>
* ) at 2006-05-18 19:28
Interesting ports on 1.1.1.1:
PORT   STATE SERVICE
23/tcp open  telnet*

*Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2.062 second*

If the newest version  still has that trouble in your network,please post
here again.

Cheers,

zhou qiang


_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev




_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev