Nmap Development mailing list archives
Nmap 3.90 Problem?
From: Alan Jones <asj () ipa net>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:43:49 -0500
I was scanning our local LAN on Friday with NMap 3.90 on Windows XP SP2 on my HP laptop with a 1gb nic and ran into an interesting problem. I had Nmap scan with the following nmap -v -sV -A -O -oA logfile 10.0.*.* After running NMap I called over to a coworker to give me any IP on our local LAN. He gave me 10.0.6.1. Guess what that was not in the log file!! In looking one of our 10.0.6.* addresses were in the log files. This range is where we keep our network switches and KVMs. Nmap got addresses in the IP reanges before and after the 10.0.6.* range but no that range. I then had Nmap check that IP address specifcally and it could see and report on that switch and others in the range. However for some unknown rason Nmap could not identify the Nortel Baystack switches and it gave me the fingerprint info and the url to submit the information. This was also suprising to me as I have had older versions of Nmap report they were Nortel switches it just got the some of the details wrong. Any ides on why Nmap may have missed that rang or why it now incorrectly identify's the switches. I appoligize for not gathering all the fingerprint data and sending it in yet. I do want to do that, but not sure I can get it for each switch before 3.91 comes out if it lands in the next day or so. Also is there an paramater to force Nmap to give all the fingerprint information for me to send in on items that may be incorrect or partly incorrect? thanks for the help Alan _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Current thread:
- Nmap 3.90 Problem? Alan Jones (Sep 11)
- Re: Nmap 3.90 Problem? Okan Demirmen (Sep 11)