Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Performance of multiple nmaps
From: "Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman" <buanzo () buanzo com ar>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:42:00 -0300
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Miguel Dilaj wrote:
Hi bro! Things are OK, hope you & your familiy are allright.
Good to hear that. My son is OK, but I divorced two months ago.
I tried mostly everything mentioned here: http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/eserver/library/es-033104.html to no avail.
Then maybe you need to rethink the whole thing. Why do you need to run that much nmap instances, on the whole port range, and with -T0? Wouldn passive scanning be of any help? - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - www.buanzo.com.ar Consultor en Seguridad Informatica President, Open Information System Security Group - Argentina -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC1muoAlpOsGhXcE0RAth+AJ9p2TjdiQXWNpGz9fBGeWtxq/eXkQCbBlmj l3++snG5WaDQbG3wJzYyIfY= =8KnY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Current thread:
- Performance of multiple nmaps Miguel Dilaj (Jul 14)
- Re: Performance of multiple nmaps Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Jul 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Performance of multiple nmaps Miguel Dilaj (Jul 14)
- Re: Performance of multiple nmaps Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Jul 14)
- Re: Performance of multiple nmaps Miguel Dilaj (Jul 14)