Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: gcc-4 troubleshooting
From: Duilio Protti <dprotti () flowgate net>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:31:31 -0300
Probably you are right. I just want to point the fact that we are working with the ifr structure. But is true that at this point of the program, both buf and ifr are pointing to the same address. Bye, Duilio. Matthew Heine wrote:
+ for(; ifr && *((u8 *)ifr) && ((u8 *)ifr) < ((u8 *)ifr) + ifc.ifc_len; I think this last changed line should be + for(; ifr && *((u8 *)ifr) && ((u8 *)ifr) < ((u8 *)buf) + ifc.ifc_len; instead.
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Current thread:
- Re: gcc-4 troubleshooting, (continued)
- Re: gcc-4 troubleshooting Fyodor (Aug 26)
- Re: gcc-4 troubleshooting Emmanuel Goldstein (Aug 27)
- Re: gcc-4 troubleshooting Greg Darke (Aug 28)
- Re: gcc-4 troubleshooting Fyodor (Aug 28)
- Re: gcc-4 troubleshooting Greg Darke (Aug 28)
- Re: gcc-4 troubleshooting Duilio J. Protti (Aug 28)
- Re: gcc-4 troubleshooting Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Aug 28)
- Re: gcc-4 troubleshooting Fyodor (Aug 29)
- Re: gcc-4 troubleshooting Duilio Protti (Aug 29)
- Re: gcc-4 troubleshooting Matthew Heine (Aug 29)
- Re: gcc-4 troubleshooting Duilio Protti (Aug 29)
- Re: gcc-4 troubleshooting Fyodor (Aug 26)