Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Nmap 3.80 preview
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 23:17:55 -0800
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:38:03PM +0100, Martin Ma?ok wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 03:17:16PM -0800, Fyodor wrote:
Actually, your version does mtu=8 for -f and mtu=8 for -ff too.
Oops. You're right. I covered the "-f" and "-f -f" cases, but forgot to adjust the separate -ff flag. Fixed for 3.81.
My original version was doing 8 for -ff and 16 for -f. I recommend this patch to get mtu=8 for '-ff', '-f -f' or '--mtu 8' and mtu=16 for '-f' or '--mtu 16':
I have a slight preference for having one -f do the smallest fragment size (8) with the mtu getting bigger for each additional -f (so 16 for -ff). So this is what I'll do for Nmap 3.81 unless there is a good reason for doing the opposite? Cheers, -F --------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org
Current thread:
- Nmap 3.80 preview Fyodor (Feb 05)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Martin Mačok (Feb 06)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Fyodor (Feb 06)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Andreas Ericsson (Feb 07)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Martin Mačok (Feb 07)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Fyodor (Feb 07)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Martin Mačok (Feb 07)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Fyodor (Feb 06)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Martin Mačok (Feb 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Fyodor (Feb 10)