Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: path inspection
From: "Max" <nmap () webwizarddesign com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:26:09 +0500
Even though FIREWALK implements this functionality already, I think this would be a cool addition to nmap. Max On 31 Oct 2003 12:16:33 PST, Florin Andrei wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 11:56, testic wrote:I think thats a good idea, although when scanning there will most likely be an awful lot of 'closed' ports so you would have to specify which port to use to measure the distance of dropped packets. Perhaps an option similar to -p where you can specify a range of ports to test, as indeed it may be the case where different service are dropped at different machines.Yes, definitely, this thing makes sense only when inspecting a very reduced range of ports, or perhaps even only on a single port. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org
Current thread:
- path inspection Florin Andrei (Oct 31)
- Re: path inspection phaseone (Oct 31)
- Re: path inspection Florin Andrei (Oct 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- path inspection testic (Oct 31)
- Re: path inspection Florin Andrei (Oct 31)
- Re: path inspection Max (Oct 31)
- Re: path inspection phaseone (Oct 31)